|
|
Post by ottoman on Oct 29, 2006 17:18:43 GMT
Muaviyya (radiallahu anh) is good or bad? some people talk about him badly!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Anwar K on Oct 30, 2006 0:27:04 GMT
Muaviyya (radiallahu anh) is good or bad? some people talk about him badly!!! Who says badly and in what way, can you explain further please brother |
|
Fana fi Shaykh
Senior Member
Haiderium Qalandaram Mastam Banda-E-Murtaza Ali Haastam .
Posts: 4,959
|
Post by Fana fi Shaykh on Oct 30, 2006 14:56:11 GMT
Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem
Assalamu 'Alaykum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuhu
ASALATU WASALAMU ALAYKA YA RASULLALLAH Salla Allahu ta'ala 'alayhi wa Sallam
Beloved brother Sayyidina Hazrat Ameer Muwaiyya Radi Allahu anhu is among the blessed Sahaba of Sarwar-e-Konain Salla Allahu ta'ala 'alayhi wa Sallam
Shia's talk bad about this great Sahaba.
JazakAllahu Khayrun
[glow=orange,2,300]Yaa Imam Zainul Abedin[/glow]
|
|
|
|
Post by aabassi on Oct 30, 2006 15:30:50 GMT
Muaviyya (radiallahu anh) is good or bad? some people talk about him badly!!! Brother i recommend you to read the following article about Hazrat Amir Mu'awiya Radi Allahu anhu. It is a comprehensive report froma sunni perspective. Mu'awiya as a Model of Islamic Governance www.bewley.virtualave.net/muawiya.html |
|
|
|
Post by ahmadfaruq on Oct 30, 2006 16:26:43 GMT
there were differences on their ijtihad.to swear him is dangerous .
|
|
|
|
Post by ottoman on Oct 31, 2006 15:27:14 GMT
Hadrat Muawiya was writing secretary of our Prophet 'sallalahu alaihi wa sallam'
|
|
|
|
Post by ottoman on Jan 26, 2007 9:43:56 GMT
Hadrat Mu’âwiya ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’anh’ was an accumulation of various honours, e.g. the honour of Islam; the honour of being one of the Sahâba; the honour of belonging to the tribe of Qoureish, which is an honour specially commended in hadîth-i-sherîfs; and the honour of being related by way of marriage to Rasûlullah ‘sall-Allâhu ’alaihi wa sallam’. So high an honour is the last one, i.e. the honour of being one of Rasûlullah’s relatives, that it has been stated that people with that honour of relationship will be with the Messenger of Allah in Paradise. If any Muslim possesses any one of the superiorities we have cited presently, it is incumbent on us to love him. Hence, it takes only average wisdom and reason to realize the magnitude of love that should be spared for a person who was in possession of the total sum of all these honours.
The disagreements and fights among the Ashâb-i-kirâm did not emanate from discord among them. For instance, Khâlid ibn Walîd and Sa’d ibn Abî Waqqâs ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’anhumâ’ disagreed with each other on a certain matter. Someone began to speak ill of Khâlid bin Walîd in the presence of Sa’d bin Abî Waqqâs. He (Sa’d bin Abî Waqqâs) presently stopped the person, saying, “Do not talk behind his back! The disagreement between us will not ruin our brotherhood in Islam.” Likewise, one day Hadrat Alî met Zubayr bin Awwâm in the street. The two blessed Sahâbîs had a somewhat harsh tiff on a certain matter in which Hadrat ’Uthmân also was involved. Abdullah, Zubayr’s son, became indignant with Hadrat Alî and began to curse him, when his father, furious at the boy’s interference, gave him a beating.
It is stated in a hadîth-i-sherîf: “The torment which my Ummat (Muslims) deserve will be inflicted in the world.” That means to say that the tumults and problems among Muslims in the world cause them to get rid of their sins. As is indicated by this hadîth-i-sherîf as well as by many another similar one, the wars among the Ashâb-i-kirâm were only temporal clashes, which added to the blessings to be given to them in Paradise. Each and every one of the Ashâb-i-kirâm ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’anhum ajma’în’ would try to please Allâhu ta’âlâ and to win His love in everything they did, clinging to whatsoever they thought was a commandment of Allâhu ta’âlâ. According to a unanimous statement of the scholars of Ahl as-Sunnat ‘rahimahumullâhu ta’âlâ’, committing a grave sin will not cause a Muslim to become a disbeliever. Then, it is by no means something canonically sanctionable to stigmatize those Sahâbîs who fought Hadrat Alî as disbelievers, to vituperate against them or to criticize them ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’anhum ajma’în’.
As is stated in the Sahîh (authentic book of hadîth-i-sherîfs) entitled Muslim, which is one of the two most valuable basic books of Muslims, and also in other books, Hadrat Mu’âwiya ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’anh’ was a secretary of the Messenger of Allah. He would write in his presence. Zayd bin Thâbit ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’anh’ would write the Wahy. Mu’âwiya would write both the Wahy and the letters (of the Messenger of Allah).
Abdullah ibn Mubârak ‘rahimahullâhu ta’âlâ’ observes: “The dust that entered the nostrils of the horse which Mu’âwiya ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’anh’ rode as he accompanied Rasûlullah ‘sall-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’alaihi wa sallam’, is a thousand times as valuable as ’Umar bin ’Abdul’azîz.” The superiority of Hadrat Mu’âwiya ‘radiy-Allâhu ’anh’ can be inferred clearly from this statement. The following hadîth-i-sherîf would suffice to tell about the greatness of Hadrat Mu’âwiya ‘radiy-Allâhu ’anh’: As Tirmuzî ‘rahimahullâhu ta’âlâ reports, Rasûlullah ‘sall-Allâhu ’alaihi wa sallam’ made the following invocation: “Yâ Rabbî! Make him hâdî and muhdî!” It means: “O my Allah! Guide him to the right path and make him a guide leading (others) to the right path!”
|
|
|
|
Post by zahidali on Jan 27, 2007 2:22:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Muhammad Shoaib on Jan 29, 2007 17:52:14 GMT
I have seen it 3 times now brother. |
|
Hafeez
Valued Member 
Islam786:Hum sab Huzoor Paak (assalatu wassallam) ke Ghulam hai
Posts: 4,019
|
Post by Hafeez on Jan 29, 2007 18:39:56 GMT
Assalamu 'Alaykum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuhu
ASALATU WASALAMU ALAYKA YA RASULLALLAH Salla Allahu ta'ala 'alayhi wa Sallam
Only the Shia talk ill of hzt Amer Muawiyyah Radi Allahu anhu, but it is our aqeeda to respect and honour hzt Amer Muawiyyah Radi Allahu anhu as a just noble and a good leader.
|
|
|
|
Post by ottoman on Mar 16, 2007 12:00:27 GMT
Muaviyya (radiallahu anh) is good or bad? some people talk about him badly!!! Brother i recommend you to read the following article about Hazrat Amir Mu'awiya Radi Allahu anhu. It is a comprehensive report froma sunni perspective. Mu'awiya as a Model of Islamic Governance www.bewley.virtualave.net/muawiya.htmlJazakallah |
|
|
|
Post by musaafir on Apr 4, 2007 13:26:50 GMT
[ Brother i recommend you to read the following article about Hazrat Amir Mu'awiya Radi Allahu anhu. It is a comprehensive report froma sunni perspective. Mu'awiya as a Model of Islamic Governance www.bewley.virtualave.net/muawiya.htmlAssalaam Alaikum Although i do not disagree with any Fazail of Hadrat Muavya Radi Allahu anhuthat are mentioned here. I would like to express my concerns on the disrespect shown in regards to Hadrat Usaman e Ghani's Radi Allahu anhu role as Khalifah,in this article. Lets not forget Hadrat Usman Radi Allahu anhu is far greater in rank than Hadrat Muavya Radi Allahu anhu aswell as being among the khilaafa e Rashida,whereas Hadrat Muavya Radi Allahu anhu is not. This website has used material from ibn taymyya and his one time student Ad Dahhabi. Although we should love and respect all sahaba Radi Allahu anhum ajmaeen we cannot let injustice be done in the case of The khilaapha e rashida especially. |
|
|
|
Post by ottoman on Aug 16, 2008 8:15:40 GMT
The disagreements and fights among the Ashâb-i-kirâm did not emanate from discord among them. For instance, Khâlid ibn Walîd and Sa’d ibn Abî Waqqâs ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’anhumâ’ disagreed with each other on a certain matter. Someone began to speak ill of Khâlid bin Walîd in the presence of Sa’d bin Abî Waqqâs. He (Sa’d bin Abî Waqqâs) presently stopped the person, saying, “Do not talk behind his back! The disagreement between us will not ruin our brotherhood in Islam.” Likewise, one day Hadrat Alî met Zubayr bin Awwâm in the street. The two blessed Sahâbîs had a somewhat harsh tiff on a certain matter in which Hadrat ’Uthmân also was involved. Abdullah, Zubayr’s son, became indignant with Hadrat Alî and began to curse him, when his father, furious at the boy’s interference, gave him a beating.
|
|
